The removal of the last Hohenstaufen claimant to the Kingdom of Sicily not
      only allowed Charles to tighten his hold on the region, but also permitted
      him to pursue another project that he had been developing. Since 1267
      Charles had been preparing to launch an expedition against Constantinople
      in order to restore the Latin Empire there, which had been lost in 1261.
      However, the invasion of Conradin in 1268 had spared the Byzantine Emperor
      Michael Palaeologus from Charles's attentions. By 1270 Charles was ready
      to try again but now another distraction appeared. 
	   His brother, Louis IX, was determined to go on crusade again, despite the
      previous fiasco in Egypt (1249 - 1252), and asked Charles to support him.
      It seems clear that Charles was less than enthusiastic about the venture
      but had decided to make the best of the situation. Over the objections of
      his councilors, Louis permitted himself to be persuaded by Charles that a
      crusade against Tunis was a better alternative than one directed towards
      Jerusalem. The Kingdom of Tunis, which had been obligated since 1158 to
      pay tribute to the King of Sicily, had used the death of Manfred as an
      excuse to stop payments. Charles saw the crusade as an opportunity to
      reinstate his authority in Tunis while fulfilling his obligation to go on
      crusade with his brother. Even then, Charles did not directly participate
      in the fighting until the Christian forces were in complete disarray, and
      his presence was demanded. Yet the result was not a decisive victory for
      the crusaders, primarily due to the death of Louis IX. The crusade finally
      ended in a negotiated peace that, other than paying for the expenses of
      the other crusaders, essentially benefited Charles. Among other things it
      restored the tribute to Charles and allowed his merchants free access to
      Tunis. The treaty was to last ten years but was renewed in 1280. However,
      Charles's ambitions in the Maghreb would bring his commercial interests
      into conflict with another maritime power in the region. The miniature at 
      the right depicts Charles of Anjou receiving ambassadors from Tunis (Bibliothèque 
      Nationale, Paris, France).
 
	  His brother, Louis IX, was determined to go on crusade again, despite the
      previous fiasco in Egypt (1249 - 1252), and asked Charles to support him.
      It seems clear that Charles was less than enthusiastic about the venture
      but had decided to make the best of the situation. Over the objections of
      his councilors, Louis permitted himself to be persuaded by Charles that a
      crusade against Tunis was a better alternative than one directed towards
      Jerusalem. The Kingdom of Tunis, which had been obligated since 1158 to
      pay tribute to the King of Sicily, had used the death of Manfred as an
      excuse to stop payments. Charles saw the crusade as an opportunity to
      reinstate his authority in Tunis while fulfilling his obligation to go on
      crusade with his brother. Even then, Charles did not directly participate
      in the fighting until the Christian forces were in complete disarray, and
      his presence was demanded. Yet the result was not a decisive victory for
      the crusaders, primarily due to the death of Louis IX. The crusade finally
      ended in a negotiated peace that, other than paying for the expenses of
      the other crusaders, essentially benefited Charles. Among other things it
      restored the tribute to Charles and allowed his merchants free access to
      Tunis. The treaty was to last ten years but was renewed in 1280. However,
      Charles's ambitions in the Maghreb would bring his commercial interests
      into conflict with another maritime power in the region. The miniature at 
      the right depicts Charles of Anjou receiving ambassadors from Tunis (Bibliothèque 
      Nationale, Paris, France).


